The Global Cold Chain Alliance (GCCA) recently joined a number of organizations in food and agriculture industries in signing a letter addressed to the United States House of Representatives and Senate supporting an amendment of the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA). The full letter can be found below.
Note: There is still a lot of uncertainty about what impact the U.S. withdrawal from TPP will have on U.S. exports, including meat and poultry. The information below gives our best assessment of the situation as it currently stands. The Global Cold Chain Alliance (GCCA) will continue to actively monitor future developments.
On January 23rd, President Trump signed a Presidential Memorandum that withdraws the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
TPP was former President Obama’s signature trade deal that would have brought together 12 countries including Japan, Vietnam, Australia and Mexico. The deal had been negotiated, but never sent to Congress for approval.
The memorandum articulates the Trump Administration’s trade policy: ”to deal directly with individual countries on a one-on-one (or bilateral) basis in negotiating future trade deals.”
The next steps toward advancing the new Trump Administration policy are uncertain with TPP countries. It appears that a potential renegotiation of NAFTA will likely be considered before opening new bilateral discussions with TPP countries.
Trump’s withdrawal leaves uncertainty with the future of the pact. Some TPP countries (Australia and New Zealand) are advocating to move forward with TPP without the United States. Other countries, including Canada, are effectively calling TPP “dead.” China is seen as a winner with the U.S. withdrawal from TPP and is pushing an alternative regional trade agreement called the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.
The U.S. withdrawal from TPP does not change the current trade policies in place for U.S. products, including meat and poultry. There is not expected to be an immediate impact on trade of U.S. agricultural products. However, there remains concern over the potential lost opportunities that TPP represented to further open markets.
The full impact won’t be known for some time, as the TPP countries consider their options for moving forward and the Trump Administration begins implementing its policy of focusing on bilateral negotiations.
Many agriculture industry groups expressed disappointment in the withdrawal from TPP and called on the Trump Administration to move forward quickly to ensure that U.S. agriculture products don’t lose ground as a result of the withdrawal. Groups expressed their desire to work with the Trump Administration to advance these goals. Below are statements from selected agriculture industry groups:
U.S. Meat Export Federation Statement (source)
USMEF remains fully committed to our valued trading partners in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). These countries account for more than 60 percent of U.S. red meat exports.
In some of these key markets, the U.S. red meat industry will remain at a serious competitive disadvantage unless meaningful market access gains are realized. We urge the new administration to utilize all means available to return the United States to a competitive position, so that our industry can continue to serve this important international customer base and further expand our export opportunities.
National Cattlemen’s Beef Association Statement (source)
“TPP and NAFTA have long been convenient political punching bags, but the reality is that foreign trade has been one of the greatest success stories in the long history of the U.S. beef industry.
“Fact is American cattle producers are already losing out on $400,000 in sales every day because we don’t have TPP, and since NAFTA was implemented, exports of American-produced beef to Mexico have grown by more than 750 percent. We’re especially concerned that the Administration is taking these actions without any meaningful alternatives in place that would compensate for the tremendous loss that cattle producers will face without TPP or NAFTA.
“Sparking a trade war with Canada, Mexico, and Asia will only lead to higher prices for American-produced beef in those markets and put our American producers at a much steeper competitive disadvantage. The fact remains that 96 percent of the world’s consumers live outside the United States, and expanding access to those consumers is the single best thing we can do to help American cattle-producing families be more successful.”
American Farm Bureau Federation (source)
With President Donald Trump’s executive action to withdraw the U.S. from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, “it is critical that the new administration begin work immediately to do all it can to develop new markets for U.S. agricultural goods and to protect and advance U.S. agricultural interests in the critical Asia-Pacific region,” according to American Farm Bureau Federation President Zippy Duvall.
AFBF viewed TPP as a positive agreement that would add $4.4 billion annually to the struggling agriculture economy.
“U.S. agriculture creates jobs and supports economic growth in rural America, and American agriculture depends on maintaining and increasing access to markets outside the United States. Trade is vital to the success of our nation’s farmers and ranchers. More than 25 percent of all U.S. ag production ultimately goes to markets outside our borders. ” — AFBF President Zippy Duvall
National Chicken Council (sourced from a news article)
The National Chicken Council noted that for the poultry industry, trade and expanding access to foreign markets are critically important. The industry exports nearly 20 percent of poultry production to more than 100 countries. In 2016 exports totaled about $3 billion.
“We look forward to working with the president and his administration on free and fair trade, tearing down barriers for chicken and gaining more access to world markets.”
For more information, please contact GCCA Vice President of Government and Legal Affairs Lowell Randel at firstname.lastname@example.org.
On July 11, 2016, the U.S. House of Representatives who voted 306 to 117 to pass legislation that preempts Vermont’s GMO labeling mandate, protects American family farmers and small businesses and provides consumers the most ingredient information than ever before. Continue reading
On February 4th, the Senate passed H.R. 2642, the Agricultural Act of 2014, by a vote of 68-32. This follows the House passage of the bill on January 29th by a margin of 251-166. The bipartisan votes ended the process to reauthorize food and agriculture programs that began over two years ago. Continue reading