Temperature-controlled storage is the backbone of the food and pharma supply chains. AB 817 and SB 716 will raise food prices, impact availability, and place barriers to business.
The Global Cold Chain Alliance (GCCA) has been deeply engaged with California policymakers on AB 817 and SB 716, two pieces of legislation introduced in response to a June 17th warehouse fire in Los Angeles.
We have sincere empathy for the Boyle Heights and neighboring communities who were affected by this incident. What happened at the Los Angeles facility was a disaster no one would have chosen, and there are incredible lessons and opportunities for future improvements in our emergency preparedness and response processes for industrial sites.
The legislation that has been recommended for Governor signature does not provide additional resources or support to communities impacted by industrial incidents, but rather assesses a financial barrier to doing business in California.
These bills would raise cold storage costs across the food and pharmaceutical supply chain — affecting growers, processors, distributors, manufacturers, and retailers — while limiting facility improvements like energy efficiency upgrades and creating serious barriers to doing business in the state. As written:
- AB 817's proposed $20 million contingency fund lacks clear guidelines for administration and access, risking inconsistent use by local governments and financial uncertainty for businesses.
- AB 817 would limit facility improvements, such as energy efficiency upgrades, if filing the necessary permits triggers a contingency fund requirement.
- AB 817 would disadvantage small and medium-sized businesses that lack the means to secure required contingency funds.
- AB 817 lacks oversight of fund management; without clear standards, local governments could use the funds inconsistently.
Cold storage is a critical component of the food supply chain. Our industry works tirelessly to prevent incidents and ensure a safe and effective cold storage supply chain – steadily investing in facilities, equipment, and other safety measures. More work is needed to ensure legislation balances the critical service our industry provides, with the protections the communities of California deserve in ensuring preparedness and response plans are in place that involve emergency response, city and local officials, and the industrial community.
Let's veto these bills, bring stakeholders to the table, and get emergency preparedness policy right instead of rushing legislation that needs significant work.
AB 817
- Applies to cold storage facilities over 20,000 sq ft; requires a contingency fund before a city/county can approve a building permit.
- Fund can take one of four forms: city/county-managed account (fee-funded), owner-managed account, surety bond, or insurance policy covering the bill's specified uses.
- Fund is capped at $20 million, with no set minimum or formula — amount and required evidence are left to the approving city/county's discretion.
SB 716
- Covers fines for health/safety violations: up to $1,000 (1st), $2,000 (2nd, same ordinance within 5 yrs), $5,000 (each additional, same ordinance within 5 yrs).
- Fines can be 10x higher (up to $50,000/violation) if the violation triggers a Governor-declared state of emergency or federal disaster declaration.
- Applies to LA County through July 2028, then statewide; exempts buildings in the 0–30th percentile of CalEnviroScreen 5.0 and Group B, E, I, and M structures under Building Standards Code Ch. 3.
Share with your elected officials how these bills will affect your businesses.
Oppose AB 817: Information and Briefing
- Statement from GCCA President and CEO, Sara M. Stickler
- Download GCCA Talking Points (Coming Soon)
Contact California Governor Newsom's Office
Oppose AB 817 Coalition Letter
- Over 35 organizations have opposed AB817. Download the letter here. (PDF)(opens in new tab)
